A paper released this month by lawyer Dr Alan Mackay of the University of Sydney looked at how the legal profession may alter if brain slices were more ubiquitous in society, indicating that law enforcement authorities might utilise brain slices to regulate prisoner conduct and assist avoid re-offending.
According to the British publication, Daily Mail, this study coincided with recent breakthroughs in brain implants championed by the likes of Elon Musk, indicating that technology dealing with mental activity may not be science fiction stuff in the near future.
Neurotechnologies are brain slices or bits of wearable technology that interact directly with the brain by monitoring or affecting neural activity.
They are also being studied by military organisations and utilised in medicine to cure Parkinson’s illness. However, these chips may be subject to hacking, allowing the offender to credibly claim at trial that they were not in control of their actions.
According to Burkard Schafer, professor of computational legal theory at the University of Edinburgh, proving the victims account can be challenging.
The suggestion was for the use of technology to regulate crime as an alternative to imposing a jail term, for example, for crimes in which a neurological disease, such as violent impulsivity, was observed to play a key part, a sentence might be imposed in connection to their gadget.
This might be a directive to keep them engaged through slide follow-up so that their state can be monitored by a psychiatrist, or it could be an active treatment plan.
Brain implants are being utilised to treat a variety of mental diseases, including depression and seizure prediction.
Is it possible to utilise brain slices to combat crime?
About Author
