A case involving paintings by the late artist Andy Warhol is set to be decided by the US Supreme Court, and it raises more philosophical than legal issues: Where does the line between the theft of art and the rights of composition and publication when the work is inspired by another piece of writing lie?
Judges will hear arguments in a dispute over publishing rights between Warhol’s heirs and celebrity photographer Lynn Gold Smith regarding photographs of his artworks from 1981 that the Rock Prinos star took today, according to Reuters.
Warhol, who passed away in 1987, played a significant role in the pop art movement that emerged in the 1950s of the previous century. He was noted for his eccentric style and his bold use of colour, and he frequently produced paintings printed on silk screens and other works inspired by images of famous subjects, such as actresses Marilyn Monroe and Elizabeth Taylor, The Queen of Britain, Elizabeth, Chinese leader Mao Zedong, boxer Muhammad Ali Clay, rock star Deby Harry, and comme
Regarding Lin Gold Smith, Prince was shot for Newsweek in 1981, and after that, Warhol created two pencil illustrations and 14 silkscreen prints based on the image of Gold Lin Smith Prince.
Lin Goldsmith, 74, claimed that she only became aware of Warhol’s work after Prince passed away in 2016. In 2017, after asking a federal court in Manhattan to rule that his actions did not violate their rights, Gold Smith opposed the Andy Warhol Foundation to violate copyright. The Supreme Court has since heard arguments in support of the lower court’s decision to rule in Gold Smith’s favour.
dew\sMarilyn.
Following the “publication rights” problem, an argument in American courts arose over Andy Warhol’s paintings.
About Author
