This agreement “enters into force on the date the United States government delivers a notice that includes an affirmation of the approval of each of the parties with respect to the provisions established in this agreement,” according to the draught.
Israel and Lebanon will simultaneously provide the United Nations the exact same coordinates for the position of the maritime border on the day that Washington sends this notice.
The key provisions of the contract
The negotiations to delineate the maritime border between Israel and Lebanon were conducted in secret, but the Associated Press reports that the negotiations resulted in an agreement. Among the most salient aspects that were divulged were:
The President of Lebanon and “the present”
An important agreement has been reached between Israel and Lebanon over the maritime border line.
It might open the door for discussions on the land borders, which are still the main source of contention.
For his part, Lebanese President Michel Aoun stressed that the completion of the South Naval border agreement after the indirect negotiations with Israel, will enable Lebanon to extract oil and gas and thus will be removed from the abyss that was fell as a result of not changing the way of government for years, in addition to the waste that young people worked in institutions and departments the public.
President Aoun stated that the demarcation deal is a gift for the Lebanese people in all of its categories and that the process of repatriating the displaced Syrians would begin next week.
Israel’s side
The agreement with Lebanon, according to the former alternative prime minister Naftali Bennett, is neither a historical triumph nor a surrender agreement.
According to Lapid, not everything that benefits Lebanon is bad for Israel.
Lapid claimed that after considering the leaders of the security services’ opinions, he decided to support the decision because there was a narrow opportunity that should have been taken advantage of.
The session of the mini cabinet for National Security Affairs (cabinet), at the end of its members, ended on the summary of the Prime Minister Labid, according to the following text: “There is an urgent importance and necessity to reach the maritime agreement with Lebanon during this period.
The captain members stated that they were in favour of paying the procedures put forth by the government for ratifying the agreement.
All cabinet members supported the text unanimously, except for Minister Elite Shaked, who refrained from voting, according to a spokesman for the Prime Minister for the Arab Media..
The key clauses of the historic deal between Israel and Lebanon, as well as “Aoun’s gift”
This agreement “enters into force on the date the United States government delivers a notice that includes an affirmation of the approval of each of the parties with respect to the provisions established in this agreement,” according to the draught.
Israel and Lebanon will simultaneously provide the United Nations the exact same coordinates for the position of the maritime border on the day that Washington sends this notice.
The key provisions of the contract
The negotiations to delineate the maritime border between Israel and Lebanon were conducted in secret, but the Associated Press reports that the negotiations resulted in an agreement. Among the most salient aspects that were divulged were:
The President of Lebanon and “the present”
The maritime border demarcation agreement, between Lebanon and Israel, represents an important settlement.
It may pave the way for talks on the land borders that are still the focus of conflict.
The completion of the South Naval Border Agreement following indirect negotiations with Israel, according to Lebanese President Michel Aoun, will allow Lebanon to extract oil and gas and thus be extricated from the abyss that was fell as a result of not changing the way of government for years, in addition to the waste that young people worked in institutions and departments the public.
President Aoun stated that the demarcation deal is a gift for the Lebanese people in all of its categories and that the process of repatriating the displaced Syrians would begin next week.
Israel’s side
The agreement with Lebanon, according to the former alternative prime minister Naftali Bennett, is neither a historical triumph nor a surrender agreement.
Lapid said not all that is good for Lebanon is bad for Israel.
Lapid claimed that after considering the leaders of the security services’ opinions, he decided to support the decision because there was a narrow opportunity that should have been taken advantage of.
“It is urgently important and necessary to complete the maritime agreement with Lebanon during this period,” Prime Minister Labid summarised the session of the mini cabinet for national security affairs (cabinet) at the conclusion of its members.
The captain members stated that they were in favour of paying the procedures put forth by the government for ratifying the agreement.
All cabinet members supported the text unanimously, except for Minister Elite Shaked, who refrained from voting, according to a spokesman for the Prime Minister for the Arab Media..
The key clauses of the historic deal between Israel and Lebanon, as well as “Aoun’s gift”
About Author
